Impartial Legal Analysis About Golan V. Holder

When I went about to first find out about that the U.S. Supreme Court wanted to give KinderConcert kids reprieve from having to listen to Peter And The Wolf by getting rid of it out of the public domain a person named Lanna told me how probably it would open up the floodgates of composers making new pieces for children learning about the orchestra. But when I read something called amicus briefs for defendants none of them submitted new music for helping the children learn about orchestra instruments which probably would have made the case go faster and because of Lawrence Golan having to go about with his orchestra to practice the new amicus brief orchestra music for children.

It was a bad move for the defendants I think and when they listen to my video about the case, they probably will hear my musical hints about how they messed up their chance to win the case so much faster and stop the people from flooding up YouTube with Peter And The Wolf Songs. Probably they thought about that they can’t combine their amicus-briefing with the slam-dunk case-winning music to solve their case fast and make Mr. Golan have to learn new music, but now they can know about how wrong they were:

In Oral arguments  there was a bunch of mumbo-jumbo about Copyright law, international treaties, and public domain, orphans, and Jimi Hendrix, which at first made some sense to me, but eventually I was able to get completely confused about whatever everybody was talking about and found out that watching the amicus-brief people on YouTube wasn’t helping either.

Also, I was able to figure out from reading things about Copyright, The #1 Amendment, International Law, and anything I could try to stumble onto over the internet about Copying things that figuring out about Copyright is too hard for me, so I better just make new things and also tell everyone else to do it too or maybe to ask Justice Ginsburg before they make something from something else or maybe from things they think are OK to use for making things.

So many people were too worried about SOPA/PIPA and “what’s next“, but if we all just go onto make new things and never try to share them or make other people see them, feel, or hear them, then we can all be OK and save the internet and prosper onto forever.

This entry was posted in Business & Economy, Internet & Technology and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Impartial Legal Analysis About Golan V. Holder

  1. jacqui says:

    This is the best slam-dunk-case-winning-music-mix-with-amicus-briefs video I’ve ever seen.
    jacqui recently posted..Seeking Your Fortune?My Profile
    Twitter:

  2. Dan says:

    Wow, i can’t help but comment on your wicked blog background! Wicked!
    Dan recently posted..Statute of Limitations – Personal InjuryMy Profile

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

CommentLuv badge
This blog uses premium CommentLuv which allows you to put your keywords with your name if you have had approved comments. Use your real name and then @ your keywords (maximum of 5)